EPV1427 - Risk management strategies in community-based psychiatry: a narrative review focusing on Italy

EPV1427

Risk management strategies in community-based psychiatry: a narrative review focusing on Italy

G. Listanti 1 2,*, S. De Persis 2, D. Tripi 1, S. Ferracuti 1

1Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza, University of Rome, Roma, 2Dipartimento Tutela e Promozione Salute Mentale, Azienda Sanitaria Locale, Rieti, Italy

 

Introduction: In psychiatry, Risk Management (RM) has mainly focused on hospital settings, while incidents of violence and burnout are increasingly affecting community-based services. In Italy, after the reform of forensic psychiatry, local mental health departments are fully responsible for the treatment of psychiatric offenders. The Italian National Action Plan for Mental Health 2025–2030 now formally recognizes RM as a strategic priority.

Objectives: This study provides an overview of key domains, critical issues, objectives and intervention strategies for RM in Italian community-based mental health services.

Methods: We conducted a non-systematic review of international and Italian literature.

Results: Our results identify 5 key domains of clinical risk:

        -  Staff well-being and safety

        -  Hospital-community continuity

        -  Forensic patients management

        -  Informed consent

        -  Training and guidelines

Specific critical issues, objectives and intervention strategies for each risk domain are summarized in Table 1.

Risk domain

Critical Issues

Objectives

Intervention Strategies

Staff well-being & safety

High emotional load; staff shortages; unsafe home visits; risk of aggressive behaviours

Burnout & violence prevention; implementing reporting systems

Person-centred culture; pre-visit risk assessment & team visits; de-escalation/crisis training

Hospital-community continuity

Limited service access; geographic & organizational barriers; chronic disorders

Strengthen transition pathways; reduce access barriers

Family engagement; proactive post-discharge follow-up; strengthening inter-service links

Forensic patients management

High clinical complexity & aggression; difficult care/containment balance; poly-drug treatments

Structured recidivism risk assessment; develop specialized teams & pathways

Use of standardized tools; joint DSM-REMS project development; specialized staff training

Informed consent

Fluctuating decisional capacity; clinical judgment-only assessment; poor SDM adoption

Regular capacity assessment; promote SDM & recovery

Use of standardized tools; recovery-oriented practices; promote SDM in rehab projects; family engagement

Training & Guidelines

Evidence-practice gap; heterogeneous training; difficulty implementing procedures & monitoring safety outcomes

Continuous EBP training & safety indicators

Continuous staff education on EBP implementation & safety outcome monitoring

Table 1. Critical issues, objectives and intervention strategies for each clinical risk domain in community-based psychiatry

Conclusions: RM in community-based psychiatry in Italy requires a systemic approach. It is essential that Italian mental health departments invest their resources in trained personnel, standardized tools, evidence-based practices, and a culture of shared decision-making. As a non-systematic review, this study is not exhaustive and further research is needed to fully map RM practices in Italian community-based psychiatric services.

 

Disclosure of Interest: None Declared